Accessibility Statement

KRATOS SAFETY is committed to making its websites accessible in accordance with Article 47 of French Law No. 2005-102 of 11 February 2005.

This accessibility statement applies to the website https://kratossafety.com/.

Compliance status

The website https://kratossafety.com/ is not compliant with the French General Accessibility Improvement Framework (RGAA), version 4.1.2.

Test results

The preliminary automated analysis, carried out by an independent third party, shows that 47.50% of the RGAA criteria are met. These results must be supplemented by a manual audit in order to constitute a compliance audit within the meaning of the RGAA.

Non-accessible content

Non-compliances

Images

  • Criterion 1.1: Does each informative image have a text alternative?
  • Criterion 1.2: Is each decorative image correctly ignored by assistive technologies?
  • Criterion 1.3: For each informative image with a text alternative, is this alternative relevant (except in special cases)?
  • Criterion 1.6: Does each informative image have a detailed description, if necessary?
  • Criterion 1.8: Each informative image of text should, in the absence of a replacement mechanism, be replaced with styled text where possible. Is this rule respected (except in special cases)?

Frames

  • Criterion 2.1: Does each frame have a frame title?
  • Criterion 2.2: For each frame with a frame title, is this title relevant?

Colours

  • Criterion 3.2: On each web page, is the contrast between the text colour and its background colour high enough (except in special cases)?
  • Criterion 3.3: On each web page, are the colours used in user interface components or informative graphic elements sufficiently contrasted (except in special cases)?

Multimedia

  • Criterion 4.1: Does each pre-recorded time-based media have, if necessary, a text transcript or an audio description (except in special cases)?
  • Criterion 4.7: Is each time-based media clearly identifiable (except in special cases)?

Tables

  • Criterion 5.5: For each data table with a title, is this title relevant?
  • Criterion 5.6: For each data table, are all column headers and row headers correctly declared?

Links

  • Criterion 6.1: Is each link explicit (except in special cases)?
  • Criterion 6.2: On each web page, does each link have a name?

Scripts

  • Criterion 7.1: Is each script, if necessary, compatible with assistive technologies?
  • Criterion 7.3: Can each script be controlled by keyboard and by any pointing device (except in special cases)?
  • Criterion 7.4: For each script that initiates a change of context, is the user warned or given control?

Mandatory elements

  • Criterion 8.6: For each web page with a page title, is this title relevant?
  • Criterion 8.7: On each web page, is each change of language indicated in the source code (except in special cases)?
  • Criterion 8.9: On each web page, tags must not be used for presentation purposes only. Is this rule respected?

Structuring information

  • Criterion 9.1: On each web page, is information structured through the appropriate use of headings?
  • Criterion 9.2: On each web page, is the document structure consistent (except in special cases)?
  • Criterion 9.3: On each web page, is each list correctly structured?

Presentation of information

  • Criterion 10.1: On the website, are style sheets used to control the presentation of information?
  • Criterion 10.7: On each web page, is the focus visible for each element receiving focus?
  • Criterion 10.8: For each web page, is hidden content intended to be ignored by assistive technologies?
  • Criterion 10.11: For each web page, can content be presented without loss of information or functionality and without requiring vertical scrolling in a window 256 px high or horizontal scrolling in a window 320 px wide (except in special cases)?
  • Criterion 10.13: On each web page, can additional content appearing on focus or hover of a user interface component be controlled by the user (except in special cases)?

Forms

  • Criterion 11.1: Does each form field have a label?
  • Criterion 11.2: Is each label associated with a form field relevant (except in special cases)?
  • Criterion 11.5: In each form, are fields of the same type grouped together, if necessary?
  • Criterion 11.9: In each form, is the label of each button relevant (except in special cases)?
  • Criterion 11.10: In each form, is input validation used appropriately (except in special cases)?
  • Criterion 11.11: In each form, is input validation accompanied, if necessary, by suggestions to help correct input errors?
  • Criterion 11.12: For each form that modifies or deletes data, or that submits answers to a test or exam, or whose submission has financial or legal consequences, can the data entered be modified, updated or retrieved by the user?

Navigation

  • Criterion 12.1: Does each set of pages have at least two different navigation systems (except in special cases)?
  • Criterion 12.6: Can content grouping areas present on several web pages (header, main navigation, main content, footer and search engine areas) be reached or skipped?
  • Criterion 12.7: On each web page, is there a skip link or quick access link to the main content area (except in special cases)?
  • Criterion 12.8: On each web page, is the tab order consistent?
  • Criterion 12.11: On each web page, can additional content appearing on hover, focus or activation of a user interface component be reached by keyboard, if necessary?

Consultation

  • Criterion 13.3: On each web page, does each downloadable office document have an accessible version, if necessary (except in special cases)?

Exemptions due to disproportionate burden

Online product catalogues (flipbook viewer): the catalogues available online from the “Catalogues” page (viewer hosted on catalog.kratossafety.com) are generated by a third-party tool and are not accessible to assistive technologies (pages displayed as images, navigation not usable by keyboard). Making them compliant would require replacing the publishing tool, which constitutes a disproportionate burden in view of the company’s resources. Alternative: all products featured in the catalogues are available as product pages on the website. For information or an adapted version of a catalogue, you can contact Kratos Safety on +33 (0)4 72 48 78 27 or at contact@kratossafety.com.

Preparation of this statement

This statement was prepared on 19 October 2026. It was last updated on 19 October 2026.

Technologies used

  • HTML
  • CSS
  • JavaScript
  • ARIA

Test environment

Tests were carried out with the following combinations:

  • Firefox + NVDA (Windows)

Tools used for testing

  • Wave
  • Web Developer Toolbar
  • RGAA Checker
  • axe DevTools

Pages of the website checked for compliance

  • Checkout process (Other)
  • Customer account - order details (Other)
  • Contact (Contact)
  • Wishlist (Other)
  • Frequently asked questions (Other)
  • Product collection (Other)
  • Product page (Other)
  • Customer account - account home (Other)
  • Customer account - order history (Other)
  • Legal notice (Legal notice)
  • Privacy policy (Other)
  • Home page (Home)
  • PDF catalogues presentation page (Content)
  • Work situation page (Other)
  • Kratos Safety brand presentation page (Content)
  • Product range selection guide page (Content)
  • Blog article (Content)
  • Blog (Content)
  • All work situations overview page (Other)

Feedback and contact

If you are unable to access any content or service, you can contact the website manager to be directed to an accessible alternative or to obtain the content in another format.

Right to compensation

Under Article 11 of the French law of February 2005, persons with disabilities are entitled to compensation for the consequences of their disability, regardless of the origin and nature of their impairment, their age or their way of life. If, despite our efforts to achieve compliance, you have difficulty accessing any content or service, please contact us so that we can direct you to an accessible alternative or provide the content in a suitable format.

Means of redress

This procedure should be used in the following case: you have reported to the website manager an accessibility issue that prevents you from accessing content or one of the portal’s services, and you have not received a satisfactory response.

You can:

Défenseur des droits
Libre réponse 71120
75342 Paris CEDEX 07